US judge: Grandparents exempt from Trump's Muslim ban
A federal judge in Hawaii has expanded the list of family
relationships needed by people seeking new visas from six
Muslim-majority countries to avoid President Donald Trump's travel ban.
US District Judge Derrick Watson on Thursday ordered the government
not to enforce the ban on grandparents, grandchildren, brothers-in-law,
sisters-in-law, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews and cousins of people in
the United States.
"Common sense, for instance, dictates that close family members be
defined to include grandparents," US District Judge Derrick Watson said
in his ruling.
"Indeed grandparents are the epitome of close family members."
Watson in Honolulu had been asked to narrowly interpret a US Supreme
Court ruling that revived parts of Trump's March 6 executive order
banning people from those countries for 90 days.
The US Supreme Court last month let the ban on travel from the six
countries go forward with a limited scope, saying it could not apply to
anyone with a credible "bona fide relationship" with a US person or
entity.
The Trump administration then decided that spouses, parents,
children, fiances and siblings would be exempt from the ban, while
grandparents and other family members travelling from Iran, Libya,
Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen would be barred.
The Trump administration also said that all refugees without a close
family tie would be blocked from the country for four months.
Trump said the measure was necessary to prevent attacks. However,
opponents including states and refugee advocacy groups, sued to stop it,
disputing its security rationale and saying it discriminated against
Muslims.
Hawaii's attorney general Douglas Chin asked Watson to issue an
injunction allowing grandparents and other family members to travel to
the United States.
Hawaii and refugee groups argue that resettlement agencies have a
"bona fide" relationship with the refugees they help, sometimes over the
course of years.
The Justice Department said its rules were properly grounded in immigration law.
In his ruling, Watson said the government had an "unduly restrictive reading" of what constituted a close family relationship.
The roll-out of the narrowed version of the ban was more subdued than
in January, when Trump first signed a more expansive version of the
order.
That sparked protests and chaos at airports around the country and the world.
Source: Al Jazeera and news agencies
No comments
Your comments and Encouragement are welcome